Investment case

Fund a practical safety system with measurable human-capital return.

Jim's Helmets is positioned for founding donors, corporate sponsors, foundations, and implementation partners who want a focused intervention: certified helmets, school-based behavior change, and transparent reporting.

$25k

Year 1 pilot model for 1,000 helmets, school logistics, education, and setup.

$25

helmet plus program support tier used in the fundraising model.

47:1

research target for lifetime economic return that should be validated with final methodology review.

Why partners invest

It is a small intervention at the exact point where the consequences become enormous.

The research frames helmets as an economic firewall: they can prevent medical catastrophe, informal debt, land loss, sibling dropout, and lost productivity.

High-need audience

Children riding as motorcycle passengers are exposed daily and often missed by enforcement.

Low unit cost

Bulk sourcing targets make a certified helmet-and-education package accessible to donors.

Behavioral design

The school pathway addresses why safety gear is worn, not just whether it is distributed.

Reportable outcomes

Helmet counts, school reach, workshops, observed use, and trade-ins can be reported clearly.

Partner lanes

Different capital can solve different parts of the same safety problem.

A mature campaign should let supporters fund the outcome they understand best while keeping the operating model unified.

Founding school sponsor

Funds helmets, fitting, parent education, and follow-up for one school cohort.

Supply chain sponsor

Supports bulk purchasing, transport, storage, sizing stock, and replacement helmets.

Measurement sponsor

Funds school-gate observation, reporting, research partnerships, and public impact dashboards.

Founding ask

Launch the first 1,000-helmet pilot.

The initial milestone proves sourcing, school operations, parent engagement, follow-up measurement, and governance controls before broader scale.

Partner-ready proof points

Urgent child safety problem, specific product criteria, school-based implementation model, conservative budget, and clear reporting pathway.